Pod Save America Hosts Call on Democrats to Cut All Israel Military Aid, No Longer Accept AIPAC Funding
Jews, Israelis Targeted in Austria Amid Surge in Antisemitic Incidents; Local Jewish Community Calls for Action
‘All of Our Strength’: Over 1,000 Pro-Israel Activists Gather in DC for Solidarity Conference
‘Devastated’: Wesley LePatner, Killed in Manhattan Mass Shooting, Was a Jewish Communal, Philanthropic Leader
Sen. Angus King Vows to No Longer Vote for Israel Military Aid Until Gaza Conditions Improve
Europe Won’t Pressure Israel to ‘Commit Suicide’ Amid Gaza Backlash, Palestinian State Push, Says Israeli FM
Israel’s National Soccer Coach Attacked in Athens Before Soccer Fans Chant ‘F–K Israel, Free Palestine’ at Match
New York Judge Sentences Neo-Nazi to 5 Years for Livestreaming Bomb Threats Against Jewish Hospitals
US Pressures Lebanon to Issue Cabinet Decision to Disarm Hezbollah Before Talks Continue
UK Plans to Recognize Palestinian State in September Unless Israel Meets Conditions, Starmer Says
Iran Shows ‘No Real Flexibility’ in Nuclear Talks, Israel Says
Error: Contact form not found.
by JNS.org
The Iran nuclear program's Arak heavy-water reactor. Photo: Nanking2012/Wikimedia Commons.
JNS.org – Israel is “deeply concerned” because Iran is showing “no real flexibility” in negotiations over its nuclear program, Israeli Intelligence and Strategic Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz said Wednesday ahead of the resumption of talks between the Islamic Republic and the P5+1 powers in New York.
“The reason that we are deeply concerned is that we feel that the negotiation is going wrong, going in the wrong direction,” Steinitz told reporters in Jerusalem. “So far the Iranians have shown no real flexibility on the two main issues: the issue of the centrifuge facilities, centrifuges for the enrichment of uranium, and the heavy-water reactor in Arak.”
After failing to reach a final agreement by a July deadline, Iran and the P5+1 powers extended the nuclear talks to Nov. 24.
“We are deeply concerned that a deal might be a bad deal,” Steinitz said. “And therefore we want to re-emphasize President Obama’s very important principle… that, in this case, no deal is better than a bad deal.”
